On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ajay kumar <ajaynumb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:25 PM, AJAY KUMAR RAMAKRISHNA SHYMALAMMA
> <ajaykumar.rs at samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Original Message -------
>>
>> Sender : Sean Paul<seanpaul at chromium.org>
>>
>> Date : Apr 30, 2014 02:34 (GMT+05:30)
>>
>> Title : Re: [RFC 0/2] drm/bridge: panel and chaining
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> > So I thought it would be easier to explain what I had in mind regarding
>> > Ajay's patchset (to add panel support) in patch form. Originally Thierry
>> > had some concerns with adding panel support in bridges ad-hoc. So this
>> > idea adds the support of chaining multiple bridges, one of which may be
>> > a panal adapter (maybe I should have called it drm_panel_adapter_bridge).
>> > There are a few rough edges and TODOs, it isn't trying to be complete
>> > yet.
>> >
>> > So the one question is about that hunk I had to move in ptn3460 from
>> > pre_enable() to enable(). If that really needs to come before the
>> > encoder and after the panel, then we should go for a slightly different
>> > approach instead: add a 'struct drm_bridge *next' ptr in 'struct
>> > drm_bridge'. Then each bridge implementation is responsible to call
>> > the next in the chain (if not null) at the appropriate points. That
>> > gives a bit more flexibility to bridges to have something both pre and
>> > post the downstream bridge/panel in each of the pre/enable/disable/post
>> > steps.
>>
>> Arbitrarily chaining bridges seems like a more robust solution to me
>> than the composite bridge.
>>
>> For the panel case, I wonder if we could change drm_bridge_init to
>> accept a panel, then we could just chain the panel calls off the
>> various places the bridge hooks are invoked in the drm layer.
>
>
> This idea originated from Rob itself. He wanted to move out drm_panel calls
> from both ptn3460 and ps8622 drivers and he wanted them at a common place.
> But Daniel suggested that having a chain of bridges is good. That is how
> composite_bridge was formed.
so I'm thinking that, given what Sean and others have said, that the
chaining inside bridge implementation would give more flexibility. By
which I mean:
struct drm_bridge {
+ struct drm_bridge *next; /* the next in the chain */
....
};
and then in each bridge implementation would do something like this
for each fxn:
static void foo_bridge_pre_enable(...)
{
... do stuff before ...
+ if (bridge->next)
+ bridge->next->pre_enable(...);
... do stuff after ...
}
it would mean now all bridge fxns are now required, even if they only
call next in chain.. we can toss in some helpers for that.
For dealing with panels, and this gets into Inki's proposal, I think
we can just declare that panels themselves implement drm_bridge
interface if needed. So drm_panel_funcs is for extra API's needed by
connector (like get_modes()) and everything else is part of
drm_bridge_funcs.
BR,
-R
> I still think we are addressing a very simple problem in a complex manner.
> I tried testing this patchset on my board, with some tweaks(explained in
> PATCH 2/2]),
> and I could get it working. This code basically adds 3 bridge structures to
> handle the calls,
> but in actual hardware you can map them to only one bridge device.
> I am still not sure what's the problem in just having the panel calls around
> the bridge calls in drm core?
>
>>
>> Feel free to ignore if this has already been explored on the other
>> thread (which I haven't been following).
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Rob Clark (2):
>> > drm/bridge: add composite and panel bridges
>> > drm/bridge/ptn3460: add panel support
>> >
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 2 +
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/drm_bridge_util.c | 251
>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/drm_bridge_util.h | 29 ++++
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 39 ++++-
>> > include/drm/bridge/ptn3460.h | 6 +-
>> > 5 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/drm_bridge_util.c
>> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/drm_bridge_util.h
>> >
>> > --
>> > 1.9.0
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > dri-devel mailing list
>> > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
