On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:42:38AM -0400, Champigny, Michael wrote: > While we are on this topic, the flags for Alpha are too restrictive. > It should be the more conservative "-mcpu=ev5". By setting it to ev6, > older Alpha's will not be able to run the compiled code. ev5 is chosen > since it will allow the compiler to schedule instructions better on > EV5 and greater processors, while remaining backwards compatible with > older EV4 and EV45 processors. BTW, the Mesa build procedure handles this > correctly. > Like Gareth said already - it's a set of default's YOU SHOULD set yourself ! Alan. _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
- [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Michel Dänzer
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Kevin E Martin
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Gareth Hughes
- RE: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Champigny, Michael
- RE: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Alan Hourihane
- RE: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Champigny, Michael
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Kevin E Martin
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def AMD-760MP
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Michel Dänzer
- Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def Alan Hourihane