Carl Busjahn wrote: > > Thanks for the information, it was very helpfull., I'm sorry If I > offended anyone by saying radeon is faster than Gf2 mx400, though it is > :-) You might want to research your hardware before you say something > like a radeon doesn't have T&L...
You should do your own research. The Radeon VE does not have T&L, and neither does the laptop Radeon chip. Even if you had a Radeon variant that does support T&L in hardware, that feature is not enabled by the current DRI drivers. Which card is "faster" depends on the speed of your processor, the nature of your application, and the drivers. Someone could reasonably say that on "X" machine, running "Y" application, with "Z" drivers, "A" card is faster than "B" card. But if you bet your life that a Radeon VE is faster than an MX400 for all, or even most, applications, you would not live very long. -Mark ------------------------------------------------------------ Mark B. Allan NASA Ames Research Center QSS Group, Inc. Neuro-Engineering Lab 650 - 604 - 0537 (office) Mail Stop 269-2 650 - 604 - 0461 (lab) Moffett Field, CA 94035 650 - 604 - 3594 (fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ic.arc.nasa.gov/ic/ne.html ------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
