On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:33:51AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Yes, exactly. But this test fails if buf->pid == 0, which is wrong. > No. As you say, 0 isn't a valid pid, ... which means the buffer is unused and the test should fail.
> which is covered by this test. ... which is not. > > Hence I added this test. See "added", not "deleted" or "replaced" > You "deleted" part of the ( buf->pid != current->pid ) test. An incorrect one though. > So the first solution works, what about the second one? I'm too lazy :-) > > I hope I'll be around on tomorrows irc meeting, we can try stuff in realtime then >:-) > Unfortunately, I can't attend tonight's meeting because I'm in military > service this week. :( D'oh. Bye, Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ICQ 10236103, +436505122023 -- The product Microsoft sells isn't the software; it's comfort. The product that Linux vendors usually sell is freedom.
msg02586/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature