On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:33:51AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Yes, exactly. But this test fails if buf->pid == 0, which is wrong. > No. As you say, 0 isn't a valid pid, ... which means the buffer is unused and the test should fail.
> which is covered by this test.
... which is not.
> > Hence I added this test. See "added", not "deleted" or "replaced"
> You "deleted" part of the ( buf->pid != current->pid ) test.
An incorrect one though.
> So the first solution works, what about the second one?
I'm too lazy :-)
> > I hope I'll be around on tomorrows irc meeting, we can try stuff in realtime then
>:-)
> Unfortunately, I can't attend tonight's meeting because I'm in military
> service this week. :(
D'oh.
Bye,
Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ICQ 10236103, +436505122023
--
The product Microsoft sells isn't the software; it's comfort.
The product that Linux vendors usually sell is freedom.
msg02586/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
