> Ugh... Ok, I see, I understand. What a shame. Really, it is- the driver as > it stands ends up being SLOWER than a mach64 under Utah-GLX. Yes, Utah-GLX > was less secure, but to be so much slower as to have the same gears framerate > with a PIII-600 as I got with a PII-450 on a supposedly slower chipset- well, > it really sickens me. What's the mach64 card going to end up being like > performance wise?
Raster wise - exactly the same. Geomtry wise - a bit worse, but maybe there are some good opts in mesa 4.0 to make up some of the difference. > Are there any cards out there that don't have seriously borked DMA models > that we have to do intrinsically inefficient things just to secure the > driver? I had hoped that the i810 would be a workable chipset for the pilot > project with my employer's planned product offerings- it would be a slow > chip, but it would allow me a way of demoing some 3D games, etc. on a set-top > box system. Now, well... The i810 is seriously raster bound for most games, I'd be suprised if it made much difference in those situations. Keith _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
