On 2002.02.22 21:35 Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:17:28PM +0000, José Fonseca wrote: > > On 2002.02.22 21:13 Alan Hourihane wrote: > > >... > > >What I meant is from a bug standpoint. If there's a bug in Mesa which > > >is fixed, then libGLcore.a needs to be replaced. This is only to do > > >with indirect rendering. A severe bug in Mesa can cause the Xserver to > > >crash as it's loaded into the Xservers name space. We've already > > >come across this a few times, and more recently with the NAN/INF > > >problems. > > > > > >Alan. > > > > > > > But can't we assume that the user is upgrading from a stable XFree > 4.2.0 > > installation? > > > No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will > be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update! > > Alan. >
hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two sets of drivers: - one with everything included, including debugging info - another with stripped binaries and without the libraries that do not interfere with the direct rendering (i.e., libGLcore and libGLX) Do you think this is reasonable? José Fonseca _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
