Robert, Great work. You are very thorough in your testing.
Comments inline. Robert Boucher wrote: > > The short answer is everything worked like you expected. > > For the details, here are the various configurations I tested (sorry if > this is mangled): > > DRM Lib i810 Kernel Module DDX/DRI Drivers Result > New New New Pass > New New Old Pass > New Old New Pass > New Old Old Pass > Old New New Fail > Old New Old Pass > Old Old New Fail > Old Old Old Pass > > Where "New" are the objects built from your development branch and "Old" > are the 4.2 versions. > > Each successful configuration was tested with glxinfo, glxgears, and a > Tux Racer race. > > In the case of the two failures, the server didn't start and the last > lines of the XFree86 log file was: > > (II) I810(0): [dri] Buffer map : ca3000 > (II) I810(0): [drm] added 256 4096 byte DMS buffers > > Fatal server error: > Caught signal 4. Server aborting I'm working on a better means of reporting this error. > Each test uses the X server I built from drmcommand branch of the DRI > source tree. > > Are there any other tests you think would be useful? You've covered the basics. If we change the error message reporting or header file layout, then a quick regression test would be great. We'll get broader coverage of the DDX/DRI drivers when we merge to the trunk. Thanks, again, for your help. -- /\ Jens Owen / \/\ _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ \ \ Steamboat Springs, Colorado _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel