On Thu, 30 May 2002 10:06:45 +0100
José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sergey and Felix,
[...]
> > > So I have the same permission problem and it only occurs with gcc 3.
> > :(( Does this mean gcc 3 sucks?:) Actually, transition from 2.96 to 3.1
> > was not easy - had to rebuild all c++ progs...
> >
>
> I don't know if its the case here. Quite often it's bugs on the code that
> are exposed by different compiler optimizations.
The C++ problem is that the name mangling has changed from gcc-2.9x to 3.x.
> Sergey, you just recompiled the DRM from the binary snapshots with gcc
> 3.1, isn't it? And as far as I could tell, Felix just recompiled the DRM
> as well. So the problem is definitely on the DRM.
Before I had compiled all the user space stuff with gcc-3.0 but the
kernel module was still compiled using gcc-2.95. This configuration
worked. Now I also recompiled the kernel module with gcc-3.0 and ran
into trouble.
Regards,
Felix
__\|/__ ___ ___ ___
__Tschüß_______\_6 6_/___/__ \___/__ \___/___\___You can do anything,___
_____Felix_______\Ä/\ \_____\ \_____\ \______U___just not everything____
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >o<__/ \___/ \___/ at the same time!
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
