Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > >>It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it. >> >>First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they should stick >>around long enough to have an email conversation about it. I'm doing free >>work for them, if I decide/am able to fix the bug, after all. >> >>The bug tracker gets in the way of any communication between me & the guy >>with the bug. It adds useless work in terms of logging into sf, fighting >>with their dumb web frontend, and whatever, every time I want to talk to >>the other person. >> >>Then, worst of all, once I fix the bug I have to go in and tell the damn >>thing that it's fixed. Why bother? The other guy presumably already >>knows, having been involved throughout... >> > > Interactivity is one of the major problems. The hassle of logging > into SF and talking with someone via that mechanism is agreeably > terrible. I'm not doubting you on that at all. > > But you can't force the bug reporter to be on dri-devel.
They can mail to it without subscribing. Keith _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
