On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 11:43:21 -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:13:11PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > True. > > > > The other alternative is to completely close the bug-tracking system > > and don't allow it. Forcing people to email. > > > > It's currently what we do for XFree86 too anyway (no bug tracker) :) > > Can you comment on how that works for XFree86? Depends on your viewpoint. Some say it doesn't, others cope fine.
> The only thing the bug tracker really buys you is a way to make sure > bugs aren't lost. If bugs are always fixed FIFO and there aren't so many > that they queue gets large then you don't need a bug tracker. I think the number of DRI users and therefore bug reporters are a much smaller base than XFree86 as a whole, and we could probably cope fine with the FIFO approach. Alan. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
