On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:18:33 +0000
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:08:15 +0000
> > Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Felix Kühling wrote:
> >>
> > [snip]
> > 
> >>Felix,  do you have versions of these that apply cleanly to the trunk?  R200 
> >>in particular.
> >>
> > 
> > I suppose the applied cleanly two weeks ago ;) New versions are attached.
> 
> Are you sure.  Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but:

Yes, I'm sure. With the r200 patch I attached to my last mail I get this
output with your command sequence:

felix@viking:~/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200$ rm r200_ioctl.c r200_context.[ch]
felix@viking:~/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200$ cvs update r200_ioctl.c 
r200_context.c r200_context.h
U r200_ioctl.c
U r200_context.c
U r200_context.h
felix@viking:~/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200$ cvs status r200_ioctl.c 
r200_context.[ch]
===================================================================
File: r200_ioctl.c      Status: Up-to-date

   Working revision:    1.10
   Repository revision: 1.10    
/cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200/r200_ioctl.c,v
   Sticky Tag:          (none)
   Sticky Date:         (none)
   Sticky Options:      (none)

===================================================================
File: r200_context.c    Status: Up-to-date

   Working revision:    1.13
   Repository revision: 1.13    
/cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200/r200_context.c,v
   Sticky Tag:          (none)
   Sticky Date:         (none)
   Sticky Options:      (none)

===================================================================
File: r200_context.h    Status: Up-to-date

   Working revision:    1.7
   Repository revision: 1.7     
/cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200/r200_context.h,v
   Sticky Tag:          (none)
   Sticky Date:         (none)
   Sticky Options:      (none)

felix@viking:~/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200$ patch < r200_smartwait.patch 
patching file r200_context.c
patching file r200_context.h
patching file r200_ioctl.c

cvs status shows the same versions as on your system. So the only
explanation is that you're not using the most recent patch or
something's wrong with your version of patch.

When I wrote that my previous patches applied cleanly two weeks ago I
was implying that things may have changed during that time and attached
new patches against the current trunk. I hope this clears things up.

Best regards,
   Felix

               __\|/__    ___     ___     ___
__Tschüß_______\_6 6_/___/__ \___/__ \___/___\___You can do anything,___
_____Felix_______\Ä/\ \_____\ \_____\ \______U___just not everything____
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    >o<__/   \___/   \___/        at the same time!


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to