On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:23:22 +0000 Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix, > > I've cleaned up the WaitForFrameCompletion function a bit & committed. The > logic is slightly different, but a lot easier to read/understand, I think. Ok, I just think that the name rmesa->irqsEmitted is now a bit misleading (can't think of a better one, though). And you removed the delay loop. I remember reading a comment like "don't hammer the bus" in the old code. And by removing the delay loop you also eliminated the cause for the IRQ/busy ping ponging. So the irqsEmitted magic should be no longer necessary. Finally, if do_irqs is disabled you alsways use usleeps. But I assume it's your intention to never do real busy waiting. Felix __\|/__ ___ ___ ___ __Tschüß_______\_6 6_/___/__ \___/__ \___/___\___You can do anything,___ _____Felix_______\Ä/\ \_____\ \_____\ \______U___just not everything____ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >o<__/ \___/ \___/ at the same time! ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel