On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:42:06 +0100 "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then you are taking about a single frame taking 1/120 seconds to > render, and not about pushing 120 frames per second to the user. > Which, if you think about it, is what I said previously. ok, fair enough. but obviously the user isnt seeing those 120 frames if their refresh is only 80. So the number reported clearly isnt the number of displayed frames (if we're not talking single buffered no-sync...) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
