On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:34:41AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:26:53AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:36:27AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> >>
> >>>David Dawes wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:55:33AM +1000, Chris Ison wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>in XFree86 log
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Symbol xf86strtof from module
> >>>>>/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a is unresolved!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>this function doesn't exist in XFree86 trunk, nor DRI trunk (going by
> >>>>>grep), how ever it is used in extras/Mesa/src/imports.c
> >>>>>
> >>>>>did someone forget to commit its definition?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>strtof isn't very portable (C99), so something else should be used 
> >>>>(maybe
> >>>>sscanf, for example).
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for the tip - I may make that change.
> >>
> >>Well, xf86strtof() won't be available in any XFree86 release in the
> >>forseeable future, and the changes that added it in the DRI tree should
> >>be backed out so that nothing else comes to rely on it.
> >
> >
> >Ah, o.k. strtod is o.k. - strtof isn't.
> 
> When I was tinkering with strtod() a while back I couldn't get it to work 
> correctly/reliably.  I suspected a bug in glibc.  strtof() seems to be OK 
> though.  I'll have to experiment with it a bit more someday.

O.k.

> Anyway, _mesa_strtof() isn't really being used yet.

Yep. I noticed that. I just changed it in the DRI trunk to cancel out
the noisy message in the XFree86 log so no-one else complains.

Alan.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to