On Son, 2003-02-09 at 02:24, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 18:56, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > Hmm, moving this to mesa-4-0-4-branch is trickier than I thought. Here's > > a quick'n'dirty merge, but maybe we want to move over more of Keith's > > recent work in this area? Keith?
[...] > Actually if __HAVE_RELEASE isn't defined, the driver on that branch should > already be doing the right thing... The trouble is if you define > __HAVE_RELEASE, the templates no longer do the DRM(reclaim_buffers) thing for > you -- I didn't realize this, and Felix has located my error. However the > version in the mesa-4-0-4 branch should (I think) work fine without the change. I see, hence the comment this patch removes, thanks for clearing this up. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
