On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:33:15PM +0000, Martin Spott wrote: > Hello, did you know that remote display of OpenGL apps is partially > functional with DRI ? At least the client side works ! I'm currently running > FlightGear on a Linux PC against an SGI Octane functioning as X terminal. > Performance is not bad - at least better than running FlightGear native on > the (low speed) Octane :-) > I don't know _why_ this works
because you're not using DRI. DRI essentially for Xserver-side stuff. The X server is on the SGI. DRI is not involved here. You're just using a libGL.so that knows how to talk the GLX extension protocol over the wire. > Running FlightGear against OpenGL libraries compiled from the identical > source tree against a DRI based Radeon X server does not look that nice. > Running the same stuff against Octane X server instead looks as everyone > loves it ;-) Which means theres a bug (or two :-) in the DRI radeon stuff. no surprise there. > P.S.: gcc-3.2.2, glibc-2.3.1, xfree86-3.4.0 ***** Amazing! ;-) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel