On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 03:06, Ian Romanick wrote: > Antoine REVERSAT wrote: > > > I just compiled dri from the CVS for my radeon 9000 Mobbility card (r250 lf) and > > it wont work as good as it is expected to (I.E : 30 fps in Quake3) The thing is > > when i do a glxinfo it is reported as a r200 chip which it isn't... So i'd like to > > know if you are aware of this and what solutions do i have. I also wanted to know > > if support should be better or if this is normal. > > For information i'm running Gentoo linux 1.4_RC4 with 2.4.21-ac3 patched kernel > > (patched for the mmu_cr4 problem) I'm running Xfree 4.3.0. > > If you need more informations let me know. > > Here's a patch that should clear some of that up, at least for the > R200-family of chips. I did change the code to include xf86PciInfo.h. > In spite of the comment there, it doesn't seem to produce any errors. > Is this a safe change to make? Also, do we really need to check the > device ID against R100-family IDs in the R200 driver?
Apparently, people do try to use the wrong drivers on the Mesa embedded and whatnot branches... Is this change really needed or even useful? I suspect this will only serve to produce more 'my chip isn't properly detected!' reports when it doesn't make any difference for the driver operation. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
