On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 07:49, Ian Romanick wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 03:06, Ian Romanick wrote: > > > >>[...] do we really need to check the > >>device ID against R100-family IDs in the R200 driver? > > > > Apparently, people do try to use the wrong drivers on the Mesa embedded > > and whatnot branches... > > How can that be? The user has to select which 3D driver to use (i.e., > the 2D driver doesn't select it for them)? What's to stop someone with > an R200 from "selecting" the MGA driver?
I don't know how things are supposed to work on those branches, but someone asked whether radeon_dri.so was the correct driver for an RV250 chip, as it didn't work correctly. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
