On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > >>Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > >> > >>>My current diff is at: > >>>http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff > >>> > >>>It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or > >>>without sisfb. I haven't tested the linux-without-sisfb case, though. > >>> > >>>My progress so far: > >>> * glxgears, geartrain, tunnel, ipers, fire, multiarb, ray, > >>> morph3d, isosurf, spectex, gloss, bounce, teapot, reflect all > >>> work. tuxracer works on FreeBSD. > >>> * DRM and DDX changes are in DRI CVS HEAD. > >>> > >>>To do: > >>> * Tuxracer crashes in sisDDDeleteTexture on linux. I have no idea > >>> why (it's crashing freeing memory which I swear is allocated). > >>> * Not sure if the fogging in fire is correct -- it looks like I > >>> would expect it to, but it disagrees with software rendering. > > This is standard -- the software render is doing perpixel fog, the hw render > doing per-vertex. There's a call (look in swrast/swrast.h) to make the sw > renderer agree with the hw one.
You mean _swrast_allow_vertex_fog and _swrast_allow_pixel_fog? No permutation of those changed anything as far as I could see. If I change the setting of the hardware back to FOG_CHEAP (like the old driver) instead of FOG_EXP (which looks good), then I get the uniform fogging on the ground like the software rasterizer. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
