On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Alex Deucher wrote: > --- Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > And the other question is why didn't Kevin want it in the > > XFree86 tree? Is there going to be a problem merging this > > code at some point in the future, or did he just think DRI > > was a natural home for it? Just curious really... > > He thought since it allowed for 3D in a dualhead > configuration, it would be a better fit in the DRI tree. > that's probably why most people would use it since xinerama > works well for 2D-only dualhead.
I may be imagining this, but in my experience mergedfb gives better performance (smoother) when solid-dragging a window from one head to the other, for example. So it's better for 2D too :) -- Bill Gallafent. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
