Slightly OT, but here's an article comparing XiG Summit, dri cvs and the ATI driver on a radeon 9000pro.
http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp_oct03.html
And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri driver is quite a bit slower (up to 50% in some subtests) in SpecViewPerf compared to the cvs version of july? Could this be related to the changes with GLX_NV_vertex_array_range, GLX_MESA_agp_offset, GLX_MESA_allocate_memory (the only extensions which changed in that timeframe) or must this be something else?
Roland, if you're interested in tracking this down, doing a binary search with cvs to find the point at which things slowed down would be hugely helpful.
Keith
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
