Slightly OT, but here's an article comparing XiG Summit, dri cvs and the ATI driver on a radeon 9000pro.
http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp_oct03.html
And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri driver is quite a bit slower (up to 50% in some subtests) in SpecViewPerf compared to the cvs version of july? Could this be related to the changes with GLX_NV_vertex_array_range, GLX_MESA_agp_offset, GLX_MESA_allocate_memory (the only extensions which changed in that timeframe) or must this be something else?
It is probably because some code paths were disabled in the r200 driver due to serious bugs. This bugs prevented UT 2k3 from running at all.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
