On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 00:13, Eric Anholt wrote: > > Seems like we need a set-understood-version ioctl. What I'm imagining > is an ioctl that takes in a DRM interface version and/or card-specific > DRM interface version. It can then adjust its response to other ioctls > appropriately. It would return the maximum of those versions that are > understood (which is sort of a duplicate of the current version ioctl, > but the generic DRM interface version is the new part). There would be > a hook for the card-specific part of the DRM to get this understood > version information, too, which may help in dealing with the radeon > issues that have been discussed.
If you mean the memory layout transition, that won't need this. > Does this seem like a good idea? It might still be useful otherwise though. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
