On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:45:06PM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Keith Whitwell wrote: > >Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > >>On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:06:33AM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > >> > >>>I'll look at at least the r200 and i830 drivers today. > >> > >> > >> > >>Keith, > >> > >>I've done the i830 driver now. > >>I've also moved over the easy parts of the radeon and r200 drivers, but > >>there's some significant changes in some of the vertex handling between > >>what's in the new Mesa trunk code and the DRI trunk code, so if you can > >>oversee that merge that'd be great. > >> > >>There's also the other issue of PRIM_PARITY for the tdfx and ffb drivers. > >> > >>Once the above is done. We're ready to merge to the trunk. > > > > > >It looks like you're following the XFree86 convention of linking .c > >files but not .h files, right? Not my favorite arrangement... > > That came across a bit spoilt-brat-ish. I don't doubt that we've got any > real choice about the way files are linked as there is the expecation that > this will get merged (one day) to XFree86 and that therefore it has to > follow their build/coding/etc standards. I personally don't enjoy trying > to develop with .c, .o and .h files spread over multiple directories, but > the idea behind all this is to get the driver development task out of the > DRI tree anyway...
No problem Keith. I totally agree, and was thinking of doing the same thing anyway. I've fixed your build problem and starting linking the .h files now too. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel