On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:46:36PM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Alan Hourihane wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:32:00PM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > >>Alan Hourihane wrote: > >> > >>>On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:06:33AM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I'll look at at least the r200 and i830 drivers today. > >>> > >>> > >>>Keith, > >>> > >>>I've done the i830 driver now. > >>> > >>>I've also moved over the easy parts of the radeon and r200 drivers, but > >>>there's some significant changes in some of the vertex handling between > >>>what's in the new Mesa trunk code and the DRI trunk code, so if you can > >>>oversee that merge that'd be great. > >>> > >>>There's also the other issue of PRIM_PARITY for the tdfx and ffb drivers. > >>> > >>>Once the above is done. We're ready to merge to the trunk. > >> > >>It looks like you're following the XFree86 convention of linking .c files > >>but not .h files, right? Not my favorite arrangement... > > > > > >Not mine either. I think I'll fix that, so it does, otherwise you have > >to be in both directories to fix things up. > > Oh - I didn't realize (see my other post...) that there is a choice. > XFree86 seems to be quite clear about only linking .c files in the few > situations where I've observed any discussion about this.
There has always been a choice. I guess it's been dependent on the person who did the work. I've never seen prejudice against doing it either way. Look at libGLU in the XFree86 tree... The Imakefiles do link their include counterparts. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
