On Iau, 2004-01-01 at 13:50, Michel DÃnzer wrote: > > Okay, you did something weird with nopage args, but I thought I did > > the equivalent of this in the original patch? > > This is about the canonical DRM code in the DRI tree.
99.9% of people run the DRM code in the kernel tree, so definitions of canonical might vary. I don't personally see a problem with the ifdefs. The DRI devel tree has to work with anything, the kernel gets the luxury of being able to strip out the defines that aren't needed for that specific release. Alan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
