On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 00:56, Ian Romanick wrote: > > Does anyone know if either the ATI or Nvidia closed-source drivers > support ARB_texture_compression for indirect rendering? If one of them > does, that would give us a test bed for the client-side protocol > support. When that support is added, we can change the library version > to 1.4 (i.e., change from libGL.so.1.2 to libGL.so.1.4, with extra .1.2 > and .1.3 symlinks).
Are those symlinks really necessary? Apps should only care about libGL.so.1 . While we're at it: is there a reason for libGL not having a patchlevel, e.g. libGL.so.1.2.0? This can cause unpleasant surprises because ldconfig will consider something like libGL.so.1.2.bak as the higher patchlevel and change libGL.so.1 to point to that instead of libGL.so.1.2 . -- Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
