On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 17:44, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Did GATOS make changes to the DRM drivers?
> 

Yes, for a while I was tracking its CVS and rebuilding often. I had
3D and video working together just fine under 2.4. Gentoo Linux even
went as far as making a drm-kernel ebuild that patched for gatos.

:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gatos

module drm-kernel

> Is it using I2C to get to the TV tuner on ATI cards?

No. I2C, so far as I know, isn't involved at all.

> 
> What else get changed in the Xfree drivers?

They have an ati.2 module (same CVSROOT) that you xmkmf against a
compiled XFree tree, then make ; make install, that provides access to
the tuner and v4l playback (MPEG acceleration). A separate kernel module
is required for video capture.

The ati.2 module replaces
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/{ati,atimisc,r128,radeon}_drv.o 

and adds
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/multimedia/{bt829,fil236,msp3430,saa7114,tda8425,tda9850,tda9886,theatre}_drv.o



> 
> --- Hod McWuff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > OK, onward and upward... I'm starting to investigate what it would take
> > to merge the GATOS functionality into the current DRI. I'm sure the
> > XFree side is going to be a pain in the ass, but I'm starting with the
> > kernel modules.
> > 
> > The first discrepancy I need cleared up is about driver support. The
> > current DRI source seems to have drivers for:
> > i810,i830,mga,r128,radeon,sis,tdfx
> > 
> > Some are split between multiple files, some are in a single file.
> > If there's a document somewhere saying what files have what, then it'd
> > help to see it.
> > 
> > The kernel copy also has a 'ffb' driver, which I'm assuming until
> > someone tells me otherwise is an out of date hack.
> > 
> > The Gatos copy has the same drivers as the DRI source, but all split
> > amongst many files. I have a feeling the gamma and SIS drivers in this
> > copy are screwed totally anyway - in fact probably only the radeon and
> > r128 drivers from Gatos are relevant anyway, plus any changes in the
> > drm_* files.
> > 
> > So, to summarize, I need to know *roughly* what's changed since the
> > Gatos folks forked, in terms of what-moved-where and an idea of any
> > structural changes. I can read the different sources and figure out the
> > code changes myself, but I need to know what I'm looking for.
> > 
> > It would seem the best approach is to merge their changes -
> > conceptually, one by one - into the current DRI sources.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dri-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
> 
> 
> =====
> Jon Smirl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to