On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 09:54, Chris Ison wrote: > ok, let me get this in perspective > > R9200 R8500 > DRI 14.621037 16.860273 > fglrx 39.461594 44.228085 > > I have been trying to hunt down the slowdown in DRI, I even if (0)'s all > occurances of sched_yield () which is slower in 2.6 than 2.4 due to 2.6 > doing it properly.
[SNIP] > Thats as far as I've gotten so far. > > Is there anything else I should be looking at? I believe the patch in this mail still needs to be done to remove the excessive flushing in the R200 driver; http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-devel&m=106668758605732&w=2 This was originally changed by discussions from this thread; http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-devel&m=105248982530908&w=2 Which resulted in this patch which added the extra flushing; http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-devel&m=105907354428969&w=2 Someone else last chased this up in November or December? -- Alan. "One must never be purposelessnessnesslessness."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
