Opps, Jon sorry. It's Jon Smirl's DirectFB replacement.
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exatly, so what's the problem?? > > The new program won't do that. However the older X server will so this > is > a non-issue. We are 'hopefully' talking about DRI enabeled systems, > making them better than Longhorn. > For non 3d(DRI) systems I would hope that Mesa would be able to use > there > 2d parts to help the software renderer work faster. This work is > needing > tobe done, it would speed up ALL OpenGL apps for these older systems, > with > or with-out Joe's work(The DirectFB replacement). > > --- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Where DRI is not supported it's not used, why should any other > driver > > be > > > forced to work every where? > > > > All the current drivers barring some OS specific things like Linux > frame > > buffer driver work when DRI isnt available on that platform and fall > > gracefully back to 2D with software 3D, including those that when DRI > is > > available use the DRI layer for 2D. > > > > This is an important part of the XFree/Xorg tradition. > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
