On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 07:56, Dave Airlie wrote: > At the moment we are adding a lot of 2.6 stuff to the DRM under > development in the DRM CVS tree and what will be merged into the -mm and > Linus trees eventually, this has meant ifdefing stuff out so 2.4 will > still work,
which is uglyfying the code significantly if done wrong > So the question is do we want to a final stable DRM for 2.4 in the next > 2.4 release? and after that point I can tag the 2.4 release in the DRM CVS > tree (and maybe branch it ...), I would strongly urge you to no longer update DRM in 2.4 in significant ways. 2.4 is the release for doing strict maintenance; people who want to run newer X will generally run 2.6 kernels as well anyway.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part