Ronny V. Vindenes wrote:
tir, 24,.08.2004 kl. 16.08 +0100, skrev Keith Whitwell:
Has anyone had a chance to try out Philipp's changes? I haven't & don't want to break the driver by commiting them without a little testing of my own.
I haven't tested it yet either, but it struck me that if we're going to add support for "non-essential" software-only extensions then we probably should add a driconf option to enable/disable such extensions since their existence can affect which code paths clients take?
I think this is a good idea for vertex programs *for now*. Once we actually generate machine code that runs well from the vertex programs, the vertex programs should be enabled by default in all drivers. We're just in a funky situation right now where vertex program performance is much worse than regular software TCL performance.
Of course, once we get to that point, I think we should get the existing TCL paths and run everything as a vertex program. I guess we can cross (and debate) that bridge when we come to it...
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
