On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:53:41 +0100, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sad, 2004-09-11 at 00:36, Jon Smirl wrote: > > inter_module can't be removed until we move to the drm_core design > > with personality modules > > Of course it can go. You just fix up the DRI to start using > try_module_get(). Actually when you have the video class driver layer it > all comes for free anyway.
I haven't used try_mode_get(); not sure what the BSD impacts are. The inter_module stuff has been in DRM since it was originally written. I just moved the exisiting code around a little. > > The DRM(probe) macro is there for the same reason. Without the macro > > if you link two DRM drivers into the kernel you'll get symbol > > Then I don't see why you've suddenely made it required undoing cleanup > that had been done ? Why does the minors patch suddenely introduce this > specific requirement ? The probe function was static before. Now it is a different file and requires the DRM() macro. I did it that was to minimize the diffs, if I move the functions around I would triple the size of the diffs. > > Alan > > -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
