Jon Smirl wrote:
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:49:14 -0700, Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
Maybe we should fork linux-core into linux-core-2.4 and linux-core-2.6
before it drifts too far from being able to run on 2.4. I suspect
linux-core would compile on 2.4 right now with minor changes. Or is it
better just to declare 2.4 finished as is?
That sounds like a good option to me. I'm sure some people will still
have 2.4 boxes around for awhile longer. I suspect we'll deprecate 2.4
faster than we did 2.2, but I think we need to keep it on the "active"
support list for a bit longer.
Which sounds good: 2.4 core, or declaring it finished and patching the
old code as needed?
Sorry for not being more clear. I meant 2.4 core.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
