On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:48:08 -0500, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we are going to fix this, can we go all the way and let crtc0_base > and crtc1_base both have any value and not force crtc0 to zero? That > would make it easier to do something like an OOPs display when X is > running. The OOPs display could use a new scan out buffer and not > disturb the one with a problem. >
that's the plan. see my makeshift patch. If you can think of a more flexible approache let me know. Alex > -- > Jon Smirl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
