> The intelfb driver doesn't support the i9XX series of Intel chips, and
> also may not actually be loaded in two cases. One is if the user is
> already using vesafb, and second when the user isn't using fbdev at all.
> 
> The case for coming up with a low level stub driver, seems to be a little
> stronger in this case rather than an fbdev/DRM glued approach. 

Agreed. In general, the "stub driver" is probably the best approach, and
then have DRM and/or fbdev hook on it.

Ben.




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to