On 6/30/05, Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> >>Please note that I havent tested this with current xorg cvs because of 
> >>various inconveniences.
> >>What about the 2560 limit?
> >>I noticed that with the new RADEONDoAdjustFrame I can have 
> >>1280x1024-1280x1024 setup if I remove the limits.
> >
> >
> > I assume you are talking about the limits of the surface regs.  I'll
> > check the databooks tonight and see if I can figure out what they
> > should be.  Apparently the fglrx driver allows 2560, but that would
> > seem to require an extra half bit of address or something.  Maybe it's
> > actually 12 bits, but they limit you to 2560 for bandwidth reasons...
> 
> Or to hit a number that is significant for marketing purposes, like some
> sort of XXXGA or HDTV standard resolution.
> 

true... I think some of those new widescreen monitors are 2560 pixels wide.

> Keith
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to