Alan Hourihane writes: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:23:52 +0200, Egbert Eich wrote: > > Alan Hourihane writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:46:41AM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > > > > For i810 and i830 it can just be removed as it isn't even used. The > > other > > > drivers just need a little tweaking to remove it's use. > > > > > > > How about casting it to drm_handle_t? > > I think we can just remove it in the other cases. I've just looked at > the via and sis drivers and it doesn't make any real use of it. I'm sure the > other drivers don't make any real use of it too. > > I think it's best to just remove it's use completely. >
Right. Some cleanup doesn't hurt. This drmAddress looks like something that was introduced without checking if something similar existed already. Egbert. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
