Title: Re: DRI vs DRM

There is a standard name the library.

See Section 8.2 - Packaging/Libraries of the OpenGL|ES spec on Khronos' web page.

It should be libGLES_xx.so where xx is CM or CL.

Regards...  Matthew

--
Blackberry-Sent
Matthew Tippett
Acting Engineering Manager, Linux Software Engineering
ATI Technologies Inc.
Ph: +1 905 882 2600 x8014 Cell: +1 416 671 0673

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Sun Jul 03 18:44:00 2005
Subject: Re: DRI vs DRM

On Sunday 03 July 2005 18:40, Brian Paul wrote:
> I said I'd like to keep the src/egl/main/ directory cross-platform.
> The Linux version of libEGL.so could certainly have additional code in
> it.  But I'm certainly open to ideas.  I just don't have much time to
> spend on this project.

I'm still not entirely convinced the EGL API belongs anywhere but libGL.  Is
there a strong motivator for libEGL?

- ajax

Reply via email to