Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4150
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-21 20:49 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > > > Is bitblt secure? > > > > I don't think so - it could be used to view system memory, > > so a check is needed. > > See comment #6. Thing is the patch switches BITBLT to use a r300 raw packet, so this would bypass usual radeon checks. I am not certain why this patch affects things at all, as I would have expected packets inherited from radeon driver to work fine - certainly Xserver should use BITBLT quite often. Perhaps, there is some subtle issue that I am missing ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel