TJ wrote:
Hi,

I have a Dell R300 of some sort. Its PCI ID was not in drm_pciids.h

so I added: (didn't know so added both heads listing)

{0x1002, 0x5b60, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_R300},\
> {0x1002, 0x5b70, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_R300}, \
2nd head should not be added. It's not exactly a r300, though it doesn't
really matter for the drm currently. It could be a x300se, x300 or x550.
The kernel doesn't get it quite right neither, probably the entries in the pci id database are inconsistent.
> 0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370
> 5B60 [Radeon X300 (PCIE)]
> 0000:01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 [Radeon
> X300SE]
It doesn't make sense that the first head is a X300 and the 2nd one a X300SE :-). See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5413 which covers this card. I'm in the process of cleaning that up, though it's difficult due to the different sources of the ids (mostly extracting from binary drivers, and various existing lists in xorg), which all either have errorneous entries, contradict each other, and are incomplete.


I am trying to get dual head to work properly. Maybe someone can
help. I don't want clone or mergefb i want two independant screens. But I only get those two modes. Here is my current configs
incarnation:
That's more of an xorg problem. Can't help you there.

Roland


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to