Keith Packard wrote:
> Here are some proposed cleanups and documentation for the drm_ttm.c APIs.
> 
> One thing I didn't change was the name of drm_ttm_fixup_caching, which is
> clearly a badly named function. Can anyone explain why you wouldn't just
> always use drm_ttm_unbind instead? The only difference is that
> drm_ttm_unbind makes sure the object is evicted before flushing caches
> and marking it as unbound.

Looks good Keith.  There are a couple of places where you need 
s/flat/flag otherwise looking great.

I can't help with the question above unfortunately...

Keith

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to