On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:28 +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Keith, I think this makes sense too. I'm hopeful Thomas would agree.
I'll wait and see what he thinks before pushing then. > > > +/* > > + * drm_bo_propose_flags: > > + * > > + * @bo: the buffer object getting new flags > > + * > > + * @new_flags: the new set of proposed flag bits > > + * > > + * @new_mask: the mask of bits changed in new_flags > > + * > > + * Modify the proposed_flag bits in @bo > > + */ > > Looks like this comment has already started to drift from the function > it is documenting?? Oops. Good catch -- I briefly considered using the shorter name, but decided that matching the field name was more important. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
