Keith Packard wrote: >On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:28 +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > >>Keith, I think this makes sense too. I'm hopeful Thomas would agree. >> >>
> >I'll wait and see what he thinks before pushing then. > > It's perfectly OK with me. /Thomas > > >>>+/* >>>+ * drm_bo_propose_flags: >>>+ * >>>+ * @bo: the buffer object getting new flags >>>+ * >>>+ * @new_flags: the new set of proposed flag bits >>>+ * >>>+ * @new_mask: the mask of bits changed in new_flags >>>+ * >>>+ * Modify the proposed_flag bits in @bo >>>+ */ >>> >>> >>Looks like this comment has already started to drift from the function >>it is documenting?? >> >> > >Oops. Good catch -- I briefly considered using the shorter name, but >decided that matching the field name was more important. > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >SF.Net email is sponsored by: >Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >It's the best place to buy or sell services >for just about anything Open Source. >http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-- >_______________________________________________ >Dri-devel mailing list >Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
