Dave Airlie wrote: >> Dave, >> >> Could you list what fixes / changes you think are needed to get TTM into >> the mainline kernel? >> >> > > 2 main reasons: > > 1) I feel there hasn't been enough open driver coverage to prove it. So > far we have done an Intel IGD, we have a lot of code that isn't required > for these devices, so the question of how much code exists purely to > support poulsbo closed source userspace there is and why we need to live > with it. Both radeon and nouveau developers have expressed frustration > about the fencing internals being really hard to work with which doesn't > bode well for maintainability in the future. > OK. So basically what I'm asking is that when we have full-feathered open source drivers available that utilize TTM, either as part of DRM core, or, if needed, as part of driver-specific code, do you see anything else that prevents that from being pushed? That would be very valuable to know for anyone starting porting work. ?
/Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
