-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Keith Packard wrote: | On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 21:41 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote: | |> As you've previously mentioned, this requires caching policy changes and |> it needs to be used with some care. | | I did't need that in my drivers as GEM handles the WB -> GPU object | transfer already. | | Object mapping is really the least important part of the system; it | should only be necessary when your GPU is deficient, or your API so | broken as to require this inefficient mechanism. I suspect we'll be | tracking 965 performance as we work to eliminate mapping, we should see | a steady increase until we're no longer mapping anything that the GPU | uses into the application's address space.
Er...what about glMapBuffer? Are we now going to force drivers to implement that via copies? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFILGzGX1gOwKyEAw8RAhYRAJsF4k9TjewdZseLAvXPlibJdKChrwCgih0p L/D5WQlfEpN+DyDgYvOUA20= =wYa/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
