On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:24:35 +0200 "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" <d.muel...@elsoft.ch> wrote:
> Hello > > What about a patch like the attached one; would this be acceptable? Ah here it is; I think Ling is off doing other things... I think we can probably expand it to include other chipsets. We can probably assume its correct unless the general definitions block has a size that doesn't match our structure size. Wanna respin it with that change (just remove the IS_85X change and add a return below the crtc_ddc_bus = -1 if the structure size doesn't match the block size). Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
