On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:36:22 +0200 "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" <d.muel...@elsoft.ch> wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Wanna respin it with that change (just remove the IS_85X change and > > add a return below the crtc_ddc_bus = -1 if the structure size > > doesn't match the block size). > > I'm not sure if i fully understood what you are trying to tell me but > have you imagined something like this? Yeah, that looks good. Can you send it to Eric with the full changelog? You can add my Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> The alternative to the get_blocksize function you added would be to expose the bdb size of each block in the first field of each struct and make find section return the block size addr rather than the contents addr, but what you have is fine too. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
