> > As a first answer, without going in depth, as i just returned from my > thursday constitutional. > > Do you have an explanation as to why this commit never made it to the > kernel?
Because it probably wasn't noticed, feel free to resend it. I'm not sure why you need a version inside the via_drm.h but I'm willing to accept that the via driver development process is messed up enough to require it. No other driver has needed it. > > > > No version was bumped, because i believe these are against the kernel > > > copy of the drm, because for some reason the kernel copy never saw > > > commit 659e9a091d3. > > And why did you suddenly start to care, while you pretty much ignored > this dead before? Would that be for technical reasons? It was discussed on unichrome-lists, but not on dri-devel where normally decisions like that would be done, but whatever, be paranoid, if you really can't be useful then please don't bother being here at all. Dave. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel