2009/11/6 Kristian Høgsberg <k...@bitplanet.net>: > Hi, > > This has come up a few time and it's something I think makes a lot of > sense. Since all driver development (afaik) now happens in linux > kernel tree, it makes sense to drop the driver bits from the drm.git > repo. I've put up a repo under
Actually, I don't think a separate libdrm makes much sense. We don't want to add yet another outside component and ask ourselves questions like "how do I maintain compatibility" (which, incidentally, have already been raised). Given this, IMO libdrm live somewhere alongside the kernel. Furthermore when pulling outside stuff we driver devs can do a kernel+DRM+libdrm pull at the same time which is a win. And also users don't have to wonder where/how to pick the right libdrm. You get the right one with your kernel. Stephane ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
